New Disney Book Targets Babies For Sexualization And Gender Confusion

AHO!!!  Me White Squaw!!!  Me Trans-racial, Apache Attack Helicopter!!!  LOL!!!  Me show you photos below.  Me piss pants laughing as I speak!!!

Only kidding (I am actually white, but happen to be interested in Native American culture - but you see my point)?

The take-home from this - why/how people cannot distinguish between fantasy and reality.  However, despite the accusations of Disney being racist and 'fetishising' other cultures, the films back then (including the ones about Native Americans) at least drew some distinction between that fantasy and reality (even though they glossed over what happened back then).

We knew Never Never Land was just a fantasy, that Native Americans didn't speak English (or if they did back then, it was very limited) and that people at least knew that they either had a 'prick' or a 'snatch', and they didn't try to be a gender that they weren't, you get my drift?  In other words, White Bull (see 'Tonka') was White Bull, NOT White Dove (though he was relegated to the mundane 'women's work', more as a punishment for doing something that he was not supposed to on a hunt, not because he wanted to)!!!  The feminists can say what they like about the 'two-spirit' people and what not, and we can all go into the stuff about gender roles, their portrayal and certain ways of 'self expression' in particular cultures - but my impression of this film is that a particular character in the film is punished by being sent to a 'gulag' of boredom with the women.

BUT in those days, they also didn't try to treat babies as adults.  As I say, people back then went through certain 'rites of passage' and had to prove themselves worthy of particular roles and that they had what it took.  They had a realistic outlook.  And most of all, they didn't think it was okay to show their backsides and just take off everything in front of people and make a complete mess of things.

Do you see the analogy?  Some people might accuse me of 'fetishising' some cultures, but I know who and what I am, and am not ashamed.  I am at least fetishising people who are (what is mainly considered, in these modern times) at the 'age of consent', who are 'old enough'.  And I understand that not everyone is completely hyper-masculine or hyper-feminine, entirely 'tough' or entirely 'tender', etc etc.

But this book (if not completely sinister) is pretty cringe-worthy....

Bitch, please - where is the hygiene, the discipline and the dignity in some of these books?  And most of all, the commonsense?  Because while might look 'cute', I am also worried about the 'sexualisation' of kids myself, and I hope most 'feminists' also have more commonsense than to allow their kids to completely take off their clothes in public, make messes and disobey their parents.

cheers,
Colleen